Peer Review Policy

Overview:

The peer-review process is a cornerstone of academic publishing, ensuring the quality, validity, and credibility of research. The International Journal of Business Studies and Global Development (IJBSGD) is committed to maintaining a rigorous and transparent peer-review system. The following guidelines outline our Peer Review Policy:

1. Objectives of Peer Review:

  • Quality Assurance: Ensure the scholarly rigor, accuracy, and relevance of submitted manuscripts.
  • Constructive Feedback: Provide authors with constructive feedback to enhance the quality of their work.
  • Ethical Standards: Evaluate manuscripts for ethical considerations, such as plagiarism and research misconduct.

2. Types of Peer Review:

  • Double-Blind Review: Both the author(s) and the reviewers remain anonymous to each other.
  • Single-Blind Review: The identity of the reviewers is concealed from the authors, but the reviewers are aware of the authors’ identities.

3. Selection of Reviewers:

  • Reviewers are selected based on their expertise, experience, and contributions to the field.
  • Diverse perspectives are considered to ensure comprehensive evaluations.

4. Reviewer Guidelines:

  • Reviewers follow the guidelines provided by IJBSGD, emphasizing ethical conduct, timeliness, confidentiality, and constructive feedback.

5. Editorial Control:

  • The Editor-in-Chief manages the peer-review process, appointing reviewers based on subject expertise.
  • The editorial team ensures the integrity of the review process and maintains final decision-making authority.

6. Reviewer Recognition:

  • Distinguished reviewers are acknowledged in published articles.
  • Exceptional reviewers may be featured on the IJBSGD website.

7. Confidentiality:

  • Manuscripts and reviewer identities are treated confidentially.
  • Reviewers must not disclose information about the manuscript or the review process without explicit permission.

8. Ethical Considerations:

  • Reviewers report any potential conflicts of interest.
  • Identify and report ethical concerns, including plagiarism or research misconduct.

9. Timely Review:

  • Reviewers are expected to submit their assessments within the agreed-upon timeframe.
  • If unable to meet deadlines, reviewers should communicate promptly with the Editorial Office.

10. Editorial Decision:

  • Based on reviewers’ recommendations, the Editor-in-Chief makes decisions regarding acceptance, revision, or rejection.
  • Authors receive feedback to guide revisions or understand reasons for rejection.

11. Appeals Process:

  • Authors have the right to appeal editorial decisions, providing evidence to support their case.
  • Appeals are reviewed by the Editorial Board, and decisions are communicated to the authors.

12. Continuous Improvement:

  • IJBSGD continuously reviews and enhances its peer-review process to meet evolving standards and ensure fairness and transparency.

Thank you for Contributing to Academic Excellence:

  • The dedication of reviewers is crucial to the success of IJBSGD. We appreciate your commitment to maintaining the highest standards of scholarly research.